Liderando os ganhos das ações de bancos estrangeiros, será que o Goldman Sachs é o maior vencedor das negociações de Trump?
Segundo o The Wall Street Journal, esse desempenho do Goldman Sachs provavelmente não é acidental. Assim como outros bancos de Wall Street, o Goldman Sachs se beneficiará do aumento das atividades de fusão e aquisição (M&A) e IPOs, bem como da flexibilização regulatória. Além disso, normalmente durante períodos prósperos em Wall Street, o Goldman Sachs também apresenta desempenho excepcional: em 2021, durante o aumento das atividades de negociação, seu retorno sobre patrimônio líquido anual atingiu 23%, enquanto o retorno geral do índice de bancos S&P 500 foi de apenas 12%. Analysis suggests that due to the significant growth of private crediting and alternative assets, goldman sachs may become a potential big winner among banks. On one hand, there will be no restrictions on private crediting during Trump's presidency, allowing it to continue growing for the next four years; on the other hand, the rise in government bond yields may also benefit private crediting.
Since Trump's election, the market's expectations for trade activities, regulatory relaxation, and private crediting have risen, with bullish factors continuing to accumulate, driving. $Goldman Sachs (GS.US)$ the arrival of the "harvest season."
In November, Goldman Sachs topped the global banks in the S&P 500 index, with a nearly 15% increase, far exceeding the approximately 9% increase in the S&P 500 bank index, and on par with the increase of private equity giant Apollo this month.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Goldman Sachs' performance is likely not accidental. Like other Wall Street banks, Goldman Sachs will benefit from increased M&A and IPO activities, as well as relaxed regulations. Moreover, during prosperous times on Wall Street, Goldman Sachs tends to perform exceptionally well: in 2021, during the surge in trading activities, its annual return on equity reached 23%, while the overall return on equity of the S&P 500 bank index was only 12%.
However, due to the significant growth in private crediting and alternative assets, Goldman Sachs may become a potential big winner among these banks.
Analysts believe that under the Trump administration, new securities regulatory agencies or systemic risk regulatory agencies may be less inclined to restrict the availability of private crediting investments with relatively poor liquidity to everyday investors, or see them as a source of financial risk. TD Cowen Washington Research Group analyst Jaret Seiberg said:
"We expect no restrictions on private crediting during the Trump administration, which is why we believe private crediting will continue to grow over the next four years."
Another reason is that the rise in government bond yields may benefit private credit, especially in rapidly growing areas such as Asset Backed Financing (ABF). Moody's Executive Vice President of Private Credit Mark Wasden said, "The increase in government bond yields will impact long-term asset rates (follow the increase)."
Although other major Wall Street banks are also involved in private credit business, analysts believe that Goldman Sachs' ongoing strategic shift may allow it to gain more significant benefits.
In its recent strategy, Goldman Sachs has shifted its asset management department from betting on the company's own funds to investing more through funds for clients. The latter has lower capital intensity and can generate stable management fee income. As of the third quarter, Goldman Sachs manages approximately $140 billion of private credit assets and continues to enter rapidly growing markets such as Asset Backed Securities (ABS).
This also means that Goldman Sachs can further expand the pre-tax profits of its asset and wealth management division by charging higher fees.
However, analysts also warn that if the tariffs implemented by Trump put pressure on large multinational companies, it may widen credit spreads or slow down client activities. Policy uncertainties or excessive market volatility caused by unexpected presidential statements, combined with rapidly rising rates, may make financing more challenging. In addition, regulatory changes sometimes do not necessarily meet people's expectations.
Editor/ping
Aviso Legal: o conteúdo deste artigo reflete exclusivamente a opinião do autor e não representa a plataforma. Este artigo não deve servir como referência para a tomada de decisões de investimento.
Talvez também goste
Anthropic pode superar SpaceX e se tornar o rei dos IPOs! Mas precisa transformar o crescimento da IA em margens de lucro no nível da Microsoft
Anthropic tem potencial para superar a SpaceX (SPCX.US) com a maior emissão de ações da história, mas analistas da PitchBook alertam que essa gigante da IA pode precisar atingir uma margem bruta de cerca de 70%, semelhante à da Microsoft (MSFT.US).
Meta de crescimento de 70% ainda é conservadora? Reunião de investidores da Nvidia “revela tudo”: se não houver restrição de fornecimento no FY28, o tamanho do negócio pode dobrar!
A equipe de gestão da Nvidia afirmou recentemente, em uma reunião com investidores, que a meta de crescimento de 70% para o ano fiscal de 28 não é o limite máximo e, se não houver restrições de fornecimento, o crescimento pode ultrapassar 100%. Atualmente, a principal questão mudou da demanda para a oferta, sendo que wafers avançados e HBM são os principais gargalos. Em relação às preocupações do mercado sobre "financiamento em ciclo", a gestão respondeu que o tamanho e o limite desses arranjos estão sob controle, com base na demanda real dos usuários finais e na capacidade de crédito dos compradores, e não em um ciclo de capital sem restrições.
Preços de criptomoedas
Mais
