USDTの‌価格USDT

Bridge Crypto & Traditional Finance Like Never Before! 🌟 Bitget, the world's largest Universal Exchange, just launched the private beta for Bitget TradFi — trade gold, forex, commodities, indices, and stocks with USDT as margin! 💰🪙 Plus, we're the FIRST exchange supporting onchain trading across the Monad ecosystem! 🚀 Trade smarter, diversify wider, and seize new opportunities in 2025. Join millions on Bitget today: https://www.bitget.com

In brief Tether co-led an $8 million investment in Speed, a Lightning Network payments firm processing $1.5 billion annually. The investment advances Tether's strategy to expand USDT on Bitcoin's Lightning Network for mainstream payments. Tether has made multiple recent investments, and made an offer to acquire Italian soccer club Juventus. Decrypt’s Art, Fashion, and Entertainment Hub. Discover SCENE Prominent stablecoin issuer Tether has announced a strategic investment in Speed, a payments infrastructure firm utilizing the Bitcoin Lightning Network and stablecoins for instant global settlements. Tether said Tuesday that it co-led Speed's $8 million funding round alongside Ego Death Capital. Via products like Speed Wallet and Speed Merchant, Tether said that Speed currently processes over $1.5 billion in annual payment volume, serving 1.2 million users and businesses. The platform offers instant payments with native Bitcoin and USDT settlement capabilities, providing reliable global routing for enterprise customers. This investment aligns with Tether's strategy to strengthen Bitcoin-based financial infrastructure and expand USDT's practical applications in real-world payments. Speed's technology utilizes the layer-2 Lightning Network and stablecoins to power high-volume, low-fee transactions with compliance and global accessibility. amp;lt;span data-mce-type="bookmark" style="display:inline-block;width:0px;overflow:hidden;line-height:0" class="mce_SELRES_start"amp;gt;amp;lt;/spanamp;gt; “Speed is showing what Lightning can achieve when paired with a stable, liquid digital dollar like USDT,” said Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino, in a statement. “We support teams building practical infrastructure that reduces friction in payments and expands access to reliable settlement rails. Speed’s execution and adoption signal that Bitcoin-rooted networks are ready for mainstream commerce.” Bitcoin recently traded at a price around $87,500, up more than 1% on the day after rebounding from a dip to nearly $85,000 on Monday. The leading cryptocurrency is down about 30% since hitting a new all-time high mark above $126,000 in early October. Users on Myriad—a prediction market operated byDecrypt's parent company, Dastan—believe Bitcoin is poised to rise back to the $100,000 level sooner than it can fall to $69,000, giving the spike 69% odds as of this writing. Tether is a major buyer and backer of Bitcoin, holding nearly $9.9 billion worth of BTC as of its latest attestation report on October 31. The company has invested in other Bitcoin-centric firms and said earlier this year that it will bring its flagship USDT stablecoin to Bitcoin and the Lightning Network. The company, which is reportedly working to raise $20 billion in funding at a $500 billion valuation, has also made a number of notable investments of late. Last week, it participated in the $81 million seed round of a robotics company, and in November, boosted its total position in YouTube rival Rumble to around $677 million at current prices. Last Friday, Tether made an all-cash offer valued around $1.2 billion to acquire a majority stake in Italian soccer giant Juventus, after buying a minority stake earlier this year. The current owner rejected the offer, however, leading to a stock price spike for the team on Monday.

JP Morgan Chase Co. has formally entered the contest for on-chain cash, and the prize is not just a new product line. It is the billions of dollars in institutional capital that now sit in zero-yield stablecoins and early tokenized funds. On Dec. 15, the $4 trillion banking giant launched the My OnChain Net Yield Fund (MONY) on the Ethereum blockchain, in its attempt to pull back liquidity into a structure it controls and regulators recognize. MONY wraps a traditional money-market fund in a token that can live on public rails, pairing the speed of crypto with the one feature payment stablecoins such as Tether and Circle cannot legally offer under new US rules: yield. That makes MONY less a DeFi experiment than JP Morgan’s attempt to redefine what “cash on-chain” means for large, KYC’d pools of capital. It also puts the bank in more direct competition with BlackRock’s BUIDL and the broader tokenized Treasuries sector, which has grown into a mid–tens of billions market as institutions look for yield-bearing, blockchain-native cash equivalents. How GENIUS tilts the field To understand the timing, one has to start with the GENIUS Act, the US stablecoin law passed earlier this year. The statute created a full licensing regime for payment stablecoins and, crucially, banned issuers from paying interest to token holders simply for holding the token. As a result, the core business model for regulated dollar stablecoins is now codified: issuers hold reserves in safe assets, collect the yield, and pass none of it through directly. For corporate treasurers and crypto funds that hold large stablecoin balances for weeks or months, that embeds a structural opportunity cost. In a world where front-end rates hover in the mid-single digits, that “stablecoin tax” can run at roughly 4–5% per year on idle balances. MONY is designed to sit outside that perimeter. It is structured as a Rule 506(c) private placement money-market fund, not a payment stablecoin. That means it is treated as a security, sold only to accredited investors, and invested in US Treasuries and fully collateralized Treasury repos. As a money fund, it is structured to pass most of the underlying income back to shareholders after fees, not to trap the entire yield at the issuer level. Crypto research firm Asva Capital noted: “Tokenized money-market funds solve a key problem: idle stablecoins earning zero yield.” By letting qualified investors subscribe and redeem in either cash or USDC via JP Morgan’s Morgan Money platform, MONY effectively creates a two-step workflow. This allows the investors to use USDC or other payment tokens for transactions, then rotate into MONY when the priority shifts to holding and earning. For JP Morgan, this is not a side bet. The bank seeded MONY with around $100 million of its own capital and is marketing it directly into its global liquidity client base. As John Donohue, head of Global Liquidity at JP Morgan Asset Management, put it, the firm expects other global systemically important banks to follow. So, the message is that tokenization has progressed past pilots; it is now a delivery mechanism for core cash products. The collateral contest The economic logic becomes clearer when you look at collateral, not wallets. Crypto derivatives markets, prime brokerage platforms and OTC desks require margin and collateral around the clock. Historically, stablecoins like USDT and USDC have been the default because they are fast and broadly accepted. They are not, however, capital efficient in a high-rate regime. Tokenized money funds are built to fill that gap. Instead of parking $100 million in stablecoins that earn nothing, a fund or trading desk can hold $100 million of MMF tokens that track a conservative portfolio of short-term government assets and still move at blockchain speed between vetted venues. BlackRock’s BUIDL product has already shown how that can evolve. Once it gained acceptance as collateral on large exchanges’ institutional rails, it stopped being “tokenization as demo” and became part of the funding stack. MONY is aimed at the same corridor, but with a different perimeter. While BUIDL has pushed aggressively into crypto-native platforms through partnerships with tokenization specialists, JP Morgan is tying MONY tightly to its own Kinexys Digital Assets stack and the existing Morgan Money distribution network. So, the pitch for MONY is not to the offshore, high-frequency trading crowd. It is to pensions, insurers, asset managers and corporates that already use money-market funds and JP Morgan’s liquidity platforms today. Donohue has argued that tokenization can “fundamentally change the speed and efficiency of transactions.” In practical terms, that means shrinking settlement windows for collateral moves from T+1 into intraday, and doing it without moving out of the banking and fund-regulation perimeter. Moreover, the risk for stablecoins is not that they disappear. It is that a meaningful slice of the large, institutional balances that currently sit in USDC or USDT for collateral and treasury purposes migrate into tokenized MMFs instead, leaving stablecoins more concentrated in payments and open DeFi. The Ethereum signal Perhaps the clearest signal in MONY’s design is the choice of Ethereum as its base chain. JP Morgan has run private ledgers and permissioned networks for years; putting a flagship cash product on a public blockchain is an acknowledgment that liquidity, tooling and counterparties have converged there. Thomas Lee of BitMine views the move as a watershed moment, stating simply that “Ethereum is the future of finance.” This is a claim now supported by the fact that the world’s largest bank is deploying its flagship tokenized cash product on the network. However, the “public” blockchain launch here comes with an asterisk. MONY is still a 506(c) security. This means that its tokens can only sit in allowlisted, KYC’d wallets, and transfers are controlled to comply with securities law and the fund’s own restrictions. That effectively splits on-chain dollar instruments into two overlapping layers. On the permissionless layer, retail users, high-frequency traders and DeFi protocols will continue to rely on Tether, USDC and similar tokens. Their value proposition is censorship resistance, universal composability and ubiquity across protocols and chains. On the permissioned layer, MONY and peer funds like BUIDL and Goldman’s and BNY Mellon’s tokenized MMFs offer regulated, yield-bearing cash equivalents to institutions that care more about audit trails, governance and counterparty risk than about permissionless composability. Their liquidity is thinner but more curated; their use cases are narrower but higher-value per dollar. Considering this, JP Morgan is betting that the next meaningful wave of on-chain volume will come from that second group: treasurers who want Ethereum’s speed and integration without taking on the regulatory ambiguity that still surrounds a large part of DeFi. A defensive pivot Ultimately, MONY looks less like a revolution against the existing system and more like a defensive pivot inside it. For a decade, fintech and crypto firms chipped away at banks’ payment, FX and custody businesses. Stablecoins then went after the most fundamental layer: deposits and cash management, offering a digital bearer-like alternative that could sit outside bank balance sheets entirely. By launching a tokenized money-market fund on public rails, JP Morgan is trying to pull some of that migration back inside its own perimeter, even if it means cannibalizing parts of its traditional deposit base. George Gatch, CEO of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, has emphasized “active management and innovation” as the core of the offering, implicitly contrasting it with the passive float-skimming model of stablecoin issuers. Meanwhile, bank is not alone. BlackRock, Goldman Sachs and BNY Mellon have already moved into tokenized MMFs and tokenized cash-equivalent products. So, JP Morgan’s entry shifts that trend from early experimentation to open competition among incumbents over who will own institutional “digital dollars” on public chains. If that competition succeeds, the effect will not be the end of stablecoins or the triumph of DeFi. Instead, it would be a quiet re-bundling as the settlement rails will be public, and the instruments running on them will look a lot like traditional money-market funds. However, the institutions earning a spread on the world’s cash will, once again, be the same Wall Street names that dominated the pre-tokenization era. The post JP Morgan’s move to Ethereum proves Wall Street is quietly hijacking the digital dollar from crypto natives appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only. Global merchants turn to crypto invoice generators to cut payment friction and streamline cross-border transactions. Summary Cross-border merchants turn to crypto invoice tools as frictionless, multi-asset payments gain demand. OxaPay simplifies checkout with one invoice link accepting BTC, ETH, USDT, TON, and more. Crypto invoice generators like OxaPay help merchants reduce abandonment and ensure predictable settlement. Cross-border businesses deal with late payments, friction-heavy checkout flows, and customers who hold very different digital assets. Merchants want a payment experience that works without adding steps, uncertainty, or volatility to their financial workflow. This shift is driving interest in crypto invoice generators, not as a trend, but as a practical tool for creating a smoother global payment process. As part of this transition, the OxaPay merchant invoice has emerged as a relevant solution by offering multi-asset flexibility and predictable settlement behavior that merchants can rely on. Simplicity at the checkout layer When a customer is ready to pay, any additional step increases the chance of abandonment. Merchants prefer a flow where one invoice link accepts whatever asset the customer already holds. OxaPay meets this expectation through a unified multi-asset checkout that supports BTC, ETH, USDT, TON, and more without forcing users to switch wallets or convert funds beforehand. A simple, registration-free payment page also improves completion rates. Customers can scan a QR code or connect a wallet instantly, creating a familiar and trustworthy experience. Many users keep their balances spread across different wallets, so OxaPay’s ability to accept partial or multi-asset payments prevents failed invoices and reduces friction. These details make the checkout process smoother and more reliable for businesses serving global customers. Stable and predictable settlement When merchants issue an invoice, they expect the final settlement to match the exact fiat amount they defined, without being exposed to market swings or fluctuating exchange rates. OxaPay supports this expectation by pricing every invoice in fiat, then settling the payment according to that value regardless of whether the customer pays in BTC, ETH, USDT, TON, or any other supported asset. Automatic conversion into stablecoins further removes volatility from daily cash flow and makes reconciliation significantly simpler for finance teams. The system also handles underpaid or overpaid transactions automatically, eliminating edge cases that typically require manual review. Combined with a dashboard that displays revenue in local currency, these capabilities streamline accounting, forecasting, and cash-flow planning. Together, they transform settlement from a manual task into a consistent and reliable operational flow. Automation that reduces operational weight The true cost of payment operations often emerges after the transaction: manual reconciliation, confirmation checks, fund transfers, and refunds. Merchants increasingly prefer systems that automate these tasks so internal teams can focus on core business activities instead of monitoring transactions. OxaPay supports this expectation with automated withdrawals to wallets or exchanges, one-click refunds that eliminate the need for re-requesting addresses, and real-time callbacks delivered via APIs and webhooks. Some merchants integrate invoicing directly into their backend systems, and tools that allow them to generate invoices via API give them greater control without adding operational overhead. As merchant activity scales, this automation becomes essential for maintaining operational efficiency. Documentation that fits accounting standards Merchants operating across regions need invoices that match traditional accounting requirements, not informal transaction logs. OxaPay issues structured PDF invoices that include fiat equivalents, timestamps, conversion details, and payment metadata so finance teams can reconcile records without extra manual steps. Downloadable reports further streamline bookkeeping, making it easier to meet internal audits and external compliance needs. This level of clarity helps businesses maintain organized, verifiable financial documentation. Security and risk control A payment system works only when both customers and merchants trust it. OxaPay provides a verified checkout environment that flags irregular behavior, prevents common mistakes like wrong-network transfers, and reduces the risk of incorrect or misrouted payments. These protections minimize disputes, lower support workload, and give customers confidence that their payment is processed safely. Together, they create a smoother, more reliable experience on both sides of the transaction. Built for real merchant needs For most merchants, crypto invoicing is no longer experimental. It has become a practical way to reduce friction, stabilize settlement, limit manual work, and maintain clear documentation. A crypto invoice generator supports these needs by turning complex payment behavior into predictable outcomes. OxaPay’s merchant invoice system reflects real workflows: pricing in fiat, accepting multiple assets, automating routine tasks, and providing records that fit existing processes. For businesses seeking reliable digital payment flows, it offers a structured and commercially grounded approach. Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

The cryptocurrency market just witnessed a staggering transaction. Whale Alert, the blockchain tracking service, reported a USDT transfer to Aave worth nearly $500 million. This single movement of 499,884,071 USDT from an unknown wallet to the leading DeFi lending platform has sent ripples through the crypto community. What does such a colossal move signify for market stability, DeFi liquidity, and future price action? Let’s dive into the implications of this major whale activity. What Does a $500 Million USDT Transfer to Aave Actually Mean? First, it’s crucial to understand what this transaction represents. A USDT transfer to Aave of this magnitude is not a simple purchase or sale. Instead, it indicates the entity—likely a crypto whale or institution—is depositing this massive sum of the Tether stablecoin into the Aave protocol. On Aave, users can deposit assets to earn interest or use them as collateral to borrow other cryptocurrencies. Therefore, this move suggests one of two primary intentions: the whale is seeking yield on a stable asset or preparing to leverage this capital to borrow other tokens, potentially for larger market maneuvers. Why Is This USDT Transfer to Aave So Significant? This isn’t just another blockchain transaction. The scale makes it a market event. Here are the key reasons this USDT transfer to Aave matters: Liquidity Injection: It pours half a billion dollars in stable liquidity directly into the DeFi ecosystem, specifically into Aave’s lending pools. Whale Confidence: Such a large deposit signals strong confidence in the safety and utility of the Aave protocol, reinforcing its position as a DeFi pillar. Market Signal: Large holders often act on sophisticated strategies. This could precede other significant moves in the market. Yield Hunting: In a climate where traditional finance offers lower returns, DeFi protocols like Aave can provide attractive yields on stablecoins, even for mega-whales. Could This Massive USDT Transfer to Aave Impact Crypto Prices? While a deposit itself doesn’t directly buy an asset like Bitcoin, its indirect effects are powerful. By supplying vast USDT liquidity to Aave, the whale increases the borrowing capacity for all users. If borrowers take out loans in this USDT to purchase other cryptocurrencies, it can create buying pressure. Conversely, if the whale later uses this USDT as collateral to borrow a volatile asset to sell, it could pressure prices. Therefore, monitoring borrowing trends on Aave following this USDT transfer to Aave becomes essential for gauging market direction. What Are the Risks Behind Such a Large Whale Move? Every large move carries potential risks. Concentrating such value in a single smart contract, while Aave is audited and robust, introduces a degree of smart contract risk. Furthermore, if the whale decides to withdraw this liquidity suddenly, it could temporarily strain the protocol. However, this event also highlights a strength: the ability of DeFi to seamlessly absorb a half-billion dollar transaction without intermediaries, showcasing the technology’s scalability and resilience. Final Verdict: Decoding the $500 Million Signal The USDT transfer to Aave is a landmark DeFi event. It underscores the maturation of the space, where institutional-scale capital flows are becoming routine. This move likely reflects a strategic allocation for yield or leveraged positions rather than panic or immediate selling. For everyday investors, it’s a reminder of the powerful forces at play in crypto markets and the critical role DeFi protocols now play in global finance. It reinforces the need to watch on-chain data, as whale movements often provide clues about the market’s next major turn. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: Who made this $500 million USDT transfer to Aave?A1: The wallet is labeled “unknown” by trackers, meaning the owner’s identity is not publicly tied to the address. It could be a crypto fund, exchange, or a private whale. Q2: Does this mean the whale is bullish on crypto?A2: Not necessarily. Depositing USDT to earn yield or as collateral is a neutral-to-bullish deployment of capital. It shows confidence in DeFi infrastructure but doesn’t directly signal a bet on rising prices for assets like Bitcoin. Q3: How does Aave benefit from this large USDT transfer?A3: Aave benefits from increased total value locked (TVL), which boosts its protocol revenue from fees and strengthens its reputation as a leading, liquid DeFi marketplace. Q4: Should I follow this whale and deposit my USDT on Aave?A4: Never invest simply because a whale does. Always conduct your own research (DYOR). Understand the risks of DeFi, including smart contract vulnerabilities and market volatility, before depositing funds. Q5: Can this transaction affect USDT’s peg to the dollar?A5: It’s highly unlikely. The transaction moves existing USDT on-chain; it doesn’t mint new tokens. Tether’s peg is maintained through its reserves and redemption mechanisms, not individual transfers. Q6: Where can I track transactions like this USDT transfer to Aave?A6: Services like Whale Alert, Etherscan, and DeFi analytics platforms (e.g., DeFi Llama) provide real-time tracking of large blockchain transactions and protocol activity. Found this analysis of the major USDT transfer to Aave insightful? Help others understand the forces shaping the crypto market by sharing this article on Twitter, LinkedIn, or your favorite social media platform. Let’s demystify whale movements together! To learn more about the latest DeFi and stablecoin trends, explore our article on key developments shaping the future of decentralized finance and institutional adoption. Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.