Bitcoin News Update: S&P Rating Drop Highlights Tether’s Risky Asset Holdings and Lack of Transparency
- S&P downgrades Tether's USDT to "5 (weak)" due to high-risk reserves and transparency gaps. - Tether's 5.6% BTC exposure exceeds overcollateralization margins, risking undercollateralization if prices drop. - CEO dismisses critique as traditional finance bias, claiming no "toxic" assets in reserves. - Regulators intensify scrutiny as stablecoin centralization risks emerge amid $184B USDT circulation. - S&P urges Tether to reduce risky assets and enhance reserve disclosure to rebuild trust.
S&P Global Lowers Tether’s USDT Rating to Weakest Level
S&P Global Ratings has assigned Tether’s USDT stablecoin its lowest possible rating—“5 (weak)”—on the agency’s 1–5 risk scale for stablecoins. This decision was driven by concerns over Tether’s growing allocation to riskier assets and ongoing issues with transparency. The downgrade highlights increasing regulatory attention on stablecoins, which are intended to maintain a consistent value by being pegged to fiat currencies such as the U.S. dollar.
As the issuer of USDT, Tether now faces mounting scrutiny regarding the makeup of its reserves and its disclosure practices, especially as regulatory expectations continue to evolve.
Concerns Over Reserve Composition
S&P’s downgrade reflects its view that Tether’s reserves now include a larger share of volatile assets like Bitcoin (BTC), gold, corporate bonds, and secured loans. These assets introduce additional credit, market, and liquidity risks. S&P specifically noted that Bitcoin now represents 5.6% of USDT’s backing, which surpasses the 3.9% overcollateralization margin. This means that if Bitcoin’s price were to fall further, Tether’s reserves might not be sufficient to fully cover USDT in circulation, raising the risk of undercollateralization.
Additionally, S&P criticized Tether for providing limited information about its custodians, counterparties, and how its reserves are managed. The agency also pointed out that Tether’s reserves are not separated in a way that would protect users if the company became insolvent.
Tether’s Response to the Downgrade
Paolo Ardoino, Tether’s CEO, responded strongly to S&P’s decision, dismissing the downgrade as evidence of traditional finance’s resistance to disruptive companies. In a statement on X, Ardoino argued that Tether is “the first overcapitalized firm in the financial industry” and insisted that its reserves do not contain any “toxic” assets. He also criticized S&P for using outdated assessment methods designed for banks rather than digital asset companies, emphasizing that Tether operates outside of conventional financial systems.
Ongoing Debate Over Transparency and Risk
This dispute has brought to light the ongoing friction between stablecoin issuers and regulators regarding transparency and risk management. Tether claims that its $184 billion in USDT is fully backed by reserves, including 116 tons of physical gold. However, S&P pointed out that the details of these assets remain unclear. Even with significant holdings in short-term U.S. Treasuries, the lack of detailed information about counterparties and reserve management undermines confidence in USDT’s stability. These concerns have fueled broader questions about the risks of centralization in stablecoins, which depend on trust in the issuer’s financial practices and governance.
Market Context and Future Outlook
The downgrade comes at a time when Bitcoin is experiencing its steepest monthly decline since 2022, contributing to volatility across the cryptocurrency market. Despite this, CoinGecko reports that USDT’s supply increased by $1 billion in November, reaching $184.4 billion. This contrast between market growth and governance concerns underscores USDT’s importance as a liquidity provider in crypto markets, even as its operational model faces greater scrutiny.
As regulators around the world push for clearer rules, the debate over the risks of stablecoin centralization is expected to intensify. S&P has suggested that Tether could improve its rating by reducing its exposure to high-risk assets and providing more detailed disclosures about its reserves and counterparties. For now, the downgrade serves as a reminder to all stablecoin issuers that transparency and robust risk management are essential for maintaining trust in the sector.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
TWT’s Updated Tokenomics Framework and What It Means for DeFi Investors: An In-Depth Analysis of Incentive Structures and Sustainable Value Growth
- TWT's 2025 tokenomics model combines deflationary supply (post-2020 burn of 90% tokens) with utility-driven incentives like Trust Premium and FlexGas to align user behavior with long-term value. - Governance rights and RWA integrations (e.g., U.S. Treasury bonds via Ondo Finance) enhance TWT's utility, attracting institutional investors and bridging DeFi with traditional finance. - Binance co-founder CZ's endorsement and bullish price projections ($15 by 2030) highlight TWT's potential as a hybrid asset

Industrial Property Prospects in Webster, NY, Boosted by Targeted Infrastructure Funding
- Webster , NY, is transforming a 300-acre Xerox brownfield into a high-tech industrial hub via $9.8M FAST NY grants and public-private partnerships (PPPs). - Infrastructure upgrades, including road realignment and sewer expansion, enabled $650M private investments like the fairlife® dairy plant, creating 250 jobs by 2025. - Residential property values rose 10.1% annually, industrial vacancy rates dropped to 2%, and ESG-focused projects like wastewater upgrades boosted investor appeal. - The model highligh

Bitcoin Updates Today: MicroStrategy’s Bold Bitcoin Move: Challenging Doubters or Setting Off a Ticking Bomb?
- MicroStrategy reaffirms Bitcoin-centric strategy, holding 3% of BTC supply despite market skepticism and stock volatility. - $21B in equity/debt financing fueled Bitcoin accumulation, creating leverage-driven profits tied to price swings and dilutive capital raises. - Stock-NET asset value parity and $5.38B institutional outflows highlight risks from Bitcoin volatility and financing model criticism. - Custody shift to Fidelity reduced on-chain transparency while index exclusion limits passive demand amid

WFE Cautions That Tokenized Stocks May Threaten Market Integrity and Lead to Regulatory Disparities
- Nasdaq pushes SEC to approve tokenized stocks, facing WFE warnings about eroded market integrity and investor protections. - WFE argues blockchain adoption costs outweigh benefits in already efficient equity markets, urging adherence to established frameworks. - SEC's crypto-friendly shift under Trump creates tension between innovation and regulatory safeguards, with global standards remaining fragmented. - Tokenized assets could enable 24/7 trading but risk regulatory fragmentation and systemic risks hi
