Loan Levels Hit Record Highs, Bankruptcies Rise: Is U.S. Farm Debt Risk Being Underestimated?
The amount of funds borrowed by American farmers to sustain their operations has reached a historic high. However, the rise in non-traditional credit and supplier credit has created gaps in the federal government's current ability to measure and track farm debt.
According to The Zhihui Finance APP, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) officials have indicated that American farmers are borrowing at record levels just to stay afloat, but the increase in non-traditional credit and trade credit has created a gap in the federal government’s current ability to measure and track farm debt.
Record Farm Debt May Be Underestimated in Official Data
Financial stress is spreading throughout the American agriculture sector. With commodity prices remaining weak and input costs high, growers have seen their profit margins squeezed for several years. Recently, trade disputes between the U.S. and major buyers have disrupted export markets, while the ongoing Israel-Iran war has driven up fertilizer and fuel costs.
As the number of farm bankruptcy filings increases, some banks have tightened credit, forcing growers to seek alternative financing channels. According to the latest USDA estimates, after adjusting for inflation, U.S. farm debt has more than doubled since 2000, rising from about $300 billion to over $605 billion this year, a record high.
However, this figure may underestimate the actual debt burden of farmers. More and more, they are borrowing from suppliers, farmer cooperatives, equipment manufacturers, fintech companies, and other non-traditional lenders, which are harder for the U.S. government to comprehensively track.
Non-Traditional Lending Surges, Tracking Becomes More Challenging
Officials report that the USDA is launching research projects to better track these debts and to assess whether financial stress in the agriculture sector could impact the broader economy.
"New lenders keep emerging, and we need to find ways to access this data," said Geoffrey Hopkins, acting assistant administrator at the USDA Economic Research Service.
Dr. Jenny Ifft, an agricultural finance professor at Kansas State University, is currently partnering with the USDA on a research project focused on non-traditional agricultural lenders. She estimates that the actual scale of debt could be two to three times what the USDA reports under its “individual and other” category, which the agency estimates will reach $45 billion by 2025.
Institutions providing supplier credit include Land O’Lakes, a Minnesota-based dairy company. As one of the largest agricultural cooperatives in the U.S., it offers lines of credit to farmers. CEO Beth Ford said at the Economic Club of New York on Tuesday that the company’s finance division had about $100 million in committed loans last fall, a figure expected to rise over $1 billion for the 2027 crop year.
Hopkins noted that, to gather vendor credit data, the USDA is cross-referencing farmer surveys with loan records from the USDA Farm Service Agency and funding research to measure the size of the non-traditional lending market, among other initiatives. The agency hopes to achieve results within two years.
“Spillover Effects”: Risks May Impact the Broader Economy
Wesley Davis, a partner at Meridian Agribusiness Advisors, noted that in the past quarter, about half of U.S. commercial farms relied on suppliers or non-traditional lenders for operating expenses, an increase of about 10% year-over-year.
Hopkins said the USDA is studying “whether there are potential areas that could have spillover effects on other parts of the economy.” He recalled that there have been situations like the subprime mortgage crisis of 2007-2010, which affected the entire economy at a time when data was limited, making it difficult to distinguish healthy from problematic debt.
Historically, USDA measures of farm debt have relied on data reported by banks, agricultural credit institutions, and other lenders to regulators. To measure supplier credit, it commonly uses the Agricultural Resource Management Survey, a roughly 24-page producer questionnaire. According to USDA data, response rates have dropped from about 68% in 2009 to nearly 33% by 2025.
The media interviewed more than 52 large-scale crop farmers in seven Midwestern and Southern states, where most reported having 7 to 10 separate lines of credit, some with more than 30. One family in Iowa reported 42 lines of credit, mainly because equipment dealers typically require a new line of credit for each new machinery purchase or lease.
Previous research has found evidence indicating that the USDA may significantly underestimate equipment debt.
A peer-reviewed 2024 study by Kansas State University, the USDA Economic Research Service, and the National Credit Union Administration analyzed more than 4.4 million equipment liens in 14 agricultural states from 2001 to 2019. The study found that the level of equipment debt issued by non-traditional lenders was four times higher than USDA’s figures.
"When many lenders serving the most financially stressed borrowers report neither debt amounts nor farm financial stress, how can lenders, policymakers, regulators, and key stakeholders accurately assess debt volumes and farm financial pressure?" asked Dr. Ifft, one of the study’s authors.
Hopkins stated that some supplier financing is already included in federal data analyzed by the USDA. He also noted that some farmers consider loans from suppliers as supplier financing, when, in fact, they are made by the Farm Credit System or commercial banks, which do report such debts to regulators.
Davis observed that suppliers and retailers who extend credit help customers buy their products but may themselves incur additional risk, especially when the credit they offer is unsecured. He said: “The risks we may see are not just for farmers themselves but could spell financial distress for the entire agribusiness ecosystem.”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Delta Air Lines Lowers Profit Forecast as Fuel Cost Increase Outpaces Ticket Price Growth
Delta Air Lines lowers its annual profit forecast due to a $6 billion increase in fuel costs; sharply rising ticket prices test travelers’ willingness to pay. The company’s refinery business is expected to generate $700 million in profits to help offset the impact of fuel costs. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Reuters Chicago, October 9 – Delta Air Lines (DAL.N) lowered the midpoint of its annual profit forecast by nearly a quarter on Friday, as surging fuel costs offset the positive effects of strong travel demand and higher ticket prices. This downgrade highlights the increasingly severe challenges faced by U.S. airlines: if fuel prices remain high, will passengers be willing to accept further price hikes? Airlines have already increased ticket prices considerably this year, and analysts warn that further hikes could test travelers’ willingness to continue spending. The Atlanta-based airline expects its annual fuel spending to increase by about $6 billion compared to last year. Its third-quarter fuel expenses jumped 62% year-on-year to $4.1 billion, more than $500 million higher than July’s expectations. When asked about the reasons for the revised forecast, Delta CFO Erik Snell told reporters, “It’s entirely a fuel issue,” noting that crude oil and refined jet fuel prices have both increased since the summer. Delta now expects adjusted annual earnings per share of $5.10–$5.60, down from its July forecast of $6.50–$7.50. According to data from London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG), the new median of $5.35 is below analysts’ average forecast of $5.46. The company expects an adjusted pre-tax profit of $4.5 billion in 2026. According to LSEG, third-quarter adjusted earnings per share were $1.72, slightly below the average analyst forecast of $1.76. Its adjusted operating margin dropped from 11.1% to 9.4%. Delta is the first major U.S. airline to report third-quarter earnings; its competitors United Airlines (UAL.O), American Airlines (AAL.O), and Southwest Airlines (LUV.N) will release their results later this month. Ticket Price Increases According to the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in the first eight months of 2026, U.S. airlines spent $42.9 billion on fuel for scheduled flights, nearly $13.2 billion more than in the previous year, despite a slight decrease in fuel consumption. Strong demand and limited seat growth have helped airlines pass higher fuel costs onto passengers. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index, over the five months ending in August, average U.S. airfares increased about 25% year-on-year. With fuel prices remaining high and industry capacity growth set to further accelerate in the fourth quarter, analysts are closely watching whether airlines including Delta can raise ticket prices further without suppressing travel demand. Deutsche Bank analysts expect the industry’s proportion of fuel costs recouped through revenue to decline in the fourth quarter, with full recovery not expected until early 2027. Delta says demand remains strong. Snell noted that with fourth-quarter bookings already near 60%, the company expects revenue to increase by around 20% year-on-year. According to LSEG, Delta forecasts fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share of $1.15–$1.65, with the median $1.40 roughly in line with analysts’ average expectation of $1.39. Refinery Advantage Delta holds an advantage over other major U.S. airlines: it owns a refinery near Philadelphia, which Snell expects will generate $700 million in profits this year. “We own a refinery, which gives us a hedge—part hedge—on fuel prices that no other airline has,” he said. Delta acquired the Monroe refinery in 2012, which processes crude oil into jet fuel and other products. While Delta must still pay market prices for fuel consumed by its airline operations, refinery profits remain within the company. When the price spread between crude oil and refined products widens, this helps offset fuel cost pressures for airlines sourcing externally. However, this protection depends on refinery margins; when margins fall, the refinery may also incur losses. Nevertheless, the refinery can only partially ease the impact of rising fuel prices. Even with an expected refinery benefit of 40 cents per gallon, Delta forecasts its fuel cost to rise from $3.61 per gallon in the third quarter to $4.25 per gallon in the fourth quarter. Snell said fuel costs are expected to remain high for some time. “Ultimately, fuel prices will come down. As to when, we’re not sure,” he said. (For the convenience of non-native English speakers, Reuters offers automated translations of its reports into several other languages. Due to possible errors or lack of context in automated translations, Reuters does not guarantee the accuracy of automated translation texts and provides them only for reader convenience. Reuters assumes no responsibility for any damages or losses from use of automated translation featur
SUI Price Pullback Sparks Debate: Correction or Next Buying Opportunity?
"SaaS Apocalypse" Debunked? Autodesk (ADSK.US) and Intuit (INTU.US) Lead Growth Against the Trend as Wall Street Reprices the "AI Eating Software" Narrative
This week, Autodesk and Intuit are expected to record their strongest weekly gains in months, defying pressure on the overall technology sector. This strong performance signals a renewed optimism in the market regarding the growth prospects of the SaaS (Software as a Service) industry.
Starlink Targets the US Mobile Communication Market, SpaceX (SPCX.US) Opens New Growth Opportunities: Wall Street Focuses on the Reshaping of the Telecom Industry Landscape
Combining the existing satellite capacity, SpaceX is supplementing its capabilities to upgrade from “occasional emergency connectivity” to “daily mobile service.” The satellite network provides wide-area coverage and fills ground blind spots, while low-frequency terrestrial networks improve connectivity inside buildings and in environments with complex obstructions. The two form a complement to each other.
Crypto prices
More
